Title: | The Gauss Hypergeometric Function |
---|---|
Description: | The Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers. |
Authors: | Robin K. S. Hankin [aut, cre] , Richard D. Morey [ctb] |
Maintainer: | Robin K. S. Hankin <[email protected]> |
License: | GPL-2 |
Version: | 1.2-15 |
Built: | 2024-11-11 04:45:23 UTC |
Source: | https://github.com/robinhankin/hypergeo |
The Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers.
The DESCRIPTION file:
Package: | hypergeo |
Title: | The Gauss Hypergeometric Function |
Version: | 1.2-15 |
Authors@R: | c( person(c("Robin", "K. S. "), "Hankin", role=c("aut","cre"), email="[email protected]", comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0001-5982-0415")), person("Richard D.", "Morey", role = "ctb", email = "[email protected]", comment = c(ORCID = "0000-0001-9220-3179")) ) |
Maintainer: | Robin K. S. Hankin <[email protected]> |
Depends: | R (>= 3.1.0) |
Imports: | elliptic (>= 1.3-5), contfrac (>= 1.1-9), deSolve, Rcpp (>= 0.12.3) |
Suggests: | magrittr,testthat |
Description: | The Gaussian hypergeometric function for complex numbers. |
LinkingTo: | Rcpp, RcppArmadillo |
License: | GPL-2 |
URL: | https://github.com/RobinHankin/hypergeo |
BugReports: | https://github.com/RobinHankin/hypergeo/issues |
Repository: | https://robinhankin.r-universe.dev |
RemoteUrl: | https://github.com/robinhankin/hypergeo |
RemoteRef: | HEAD |
RemoteSha: | e64c4148abc06b22c28243f3011ac9816bf28ac3 |
Author: | Robin K. S. Hankin [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-0415>), Richard D. Morey [ctb] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9220-3179>) |
Index of help topics:
buhring Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using Buhring's method complex_gamma Gamma function for complex arguments complex_gamma_cpp Low-level C functions f15.3.1 Hypergeometric function using Euler's integral representation f15.3.10 Transformations of the hypergeometric function f15.3.3 Various transformation formulae for the hypergeometric function f15.5.1 Hypergeometric functions via direct numerical integration genhypergeo The generalized hypergeometric function hypergeo The hypergeometric function hypergeo-package The Gauss hypergeometric function hypergeo_A_nonpos_int Hypergeometric functions for nonpositive integer arguments hypergeo_contfrac Continued fraction expansion of the hypergeometric function hypergeo_cover1 Hypergeometric functions for special values of the parameters hypergeo_gosper Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using Gosper's method hypergeo_powerseries The hypergeometric function as determined by power series hypergeo_residue Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using the residue theorem i15.3.6 Helper functions is.nonpos Various utilities shanks Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using Shanks's method wolfram Various functions taken from the Wolfram Functions Site
Robin K. S. Hankin [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-0415>), Richard D. Morey [ctb] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9220-3179>) Original R code written by Robin Hankin, C++ by Richard Morey.
Maintainer: Robin K. S. Hankin <[email protected]>
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
R. K. S. Hankin 2015. “Numerical Evaluation of the Gauss Hypergeometric Function with the hypergeo Package”. The R Journal 7:2, pp81-88
hypergeo(1.1,2.3,1.9 , 1+6i) options(showHGcalls = TRUE) # any non-null value counts as TRUE hypergeo(4.1, 3.1, 5.1, 1+1i) # shows trace back options(showHGcalls = FALSE) # reset
hypergeo(1.1,2.3,1.9 , 1+6i) options(showHGcalls = TRUE) # any non-null value counts as TRUE hypergeo(4.1, 3.1, 5.1, 1+1i) # shows trace back options(showHGcalls = FALSE) # reset
Expansion of the hypergeometric function
using the residue theorem; useful for when the primary argument is close
to the critical points
hypergeo_buhring(A,B,C,z,z0=1/2,tol=0,maxiter=2000,use11=TRUE) buhring_eqn11(n,S,A,B,C,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn12(n,S,A,B,C,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn5_factors(A,B,C,z,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn5_series(S,A,B,C,z,z0=1/2,use11=FALSE,tol=0,maxiter=2000)
hypergeo_buhring(A,B,C,z,z0=1/2,tol=0,maxiter=2000,use11=TRUE) buhring_eqn11(n,S,A,B,C,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn12(n,S,A,B,C,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn5_factors(A,B,C,z,z0=1/2) buhring_eqn5_series(S,A,B,C,z,z0=1/2,use11=FALSE,tol=0,maxiter=2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters (real) |
S |
Parameter taken to be either |
n |
Term to calculate in |
z |
Primary complex argument |
z0 |
Centre of circle of non-convergence; series expressed in
powers of |
tol , maxiter
|
tolerance and maximum number of iterations (as
in |
use11 |
Boolean with default |
The functions are direct transcriptions of Buhring 1987. The basic
idea is to expand the hypergeometric function in powers of
.
Functions buhring_eqn11()
and buhring_eqn12()
return the
coefficients given by equations 11 and 12 of Buhring
1987.
The series do not converge satisfactorily near the critical points due
to some sort of numerical instability. But they seem to work OK if
is large.
There is some issue which prevents the series from converging correctly, also sometimes the sequence converges to a demonstrably incorrect value.
Robin K. S. Hankin
W. Buhring 1987. “An analytic continuation of the hypergeometric series”, Siam J. Math. Anal. 18(3)
# should be identical: buhring_eqn11(n=0:10,S=1/2,A=1/2,B=1/3,C=pi) buhring_eqn12(n=0:10,S=1/2,A=1/2,B=1/3,C=pi) # but differ in one element a <- hypergeo(1/2,1/3,4,1+8i,maxiter=90) b <- hypergeo_buhring(1/2,1/3,4,1+8i,maxiter=90) # should be identical but are not # following command fails due to numerical instability: ## Not run: hypergeo_buhring(1/2,1/3,pi,z=1/2 + 1i*sqrt(3)/2) ## End(Not run)
# should be identical: buhring_eqn11(n=0:10,S=1/2,A=1/2,B=1/3,C=pi) buhring_eqn12(n=0:10,S=1/2,A=1/2,B=1/3,C=pi) # but differ in one element a <- hypergeo(1/2,1/3,4,1+8i,maxiter=90) b <- hypergeo_buhring(1/2,1/3,4,1+8i,maxiter=90) # should be identical but are not # following command fails due to numerical instability: ## Not run: hypergeo_buhring(1/2,1/3,pi,z=1/2 + 1i*sqrt(3)/2) ## End(Not run)
Gamma and factorial functions for complex arguments
complex_gamma(z, log = FALSE) complex_factorial(z, log = FALSE) lanczos(z,log=FALSE)
complex_gamma(z, log = FALSE) complex_factorial(z, log = FALSE) lanczos(z,log=FALSE)
z |
Primary argument, a complex vector |
log |
Boolean, with default |
Method follows that of Lanczos, coefficients identical to those of the GSL
Robin K. S. Hankin
Lanczos, C. 1964. “A precision approximation of the gamma function”. Journal of the society for industrial and applied mathematics series B, Volume 1, pp86-96
M. Galassi et al, GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual (3rd Ed.), ISBN 0954612078.
complex_gamma(5) # should be 4!=24 complex_gamma(1+1i) # takes complex arguments complex_gamma(-5/2) + sqrt(pi)*8/15 # should be small z <- pi + 1i*sqrt(2) complex_gamma(z+1)-z*complex_gamma(z) # should be small complex_gamma(z)*complex_gamma(1-z) - pi/sin(pi*z) # small
complex_gamma(5) # should be 4!=24 complex_gamma(1+1i) # takes complex arguments complex_gamma(-5/2) + sqrt(pi)*8/15 # should be small z <- pi + 1i*sqrt(2) complex_gamma(z+1)-z*complex_gamma(z) # should be small complex_gamma(z)*complex_gamma(1-z) - pi/sin(pi*z) # small
Various low-level functions written in C for efficiency
complex_gamma_cpp(real,imag) lanczos_cpp(real,imag) genhypergeo_series_cpp(real_U, imag_U, real_L, imag_L, real_z, imag_z, tol, maxiter, check_mod, polynomial)
complex_gamma_cpp(real,imag) lanczos_cpp(real,imag) genhypergeo_series_cpp(real_U, imag_U, real_L, imag_L, real_z, imag_z, tol, maxiter, check_mod, polynomial)
real , imag , real_U , imag_U , real_L , imag_L , real_z , imag_z
|
Numeric vectors giving the real and imaginary components of arguments; “U” and “L” stand for Upper or Lower arguments respectively |
tol , maxiter , check_mod , polynomial
|
As for
|
NOTE HERE
Robin K. S. Hankin
1+1
1+1
Hypergeometric function using Euler's integral representation, evaluated using numerical contour integrals.
f15.3.1(A, B, C, z, h = 0)
f15.3.1(A, B, C, z, h = 0)
A , B , C
|
Parameters |
z |
Primary complex argument |
h |
specification for the path to be taken; see details |
Argument h
specifies the path to be taken (the path has to
avoid the point ). If
h
is real and of length 1, the
path taken comprises two straight lines: one from to
and one from
to
(if
the
integration is performed over a single segment).
Otherwise, the integration is performed over length(h)+1
segments: to
h[1]
, then h[i]
to h[i+1]
for and finally
h[n]
to 1.
See examples and notes sections below.
The Mellin-Barnes form is not yet coded up.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
# For |z| <1 the path can be direct: f15.3.1(2,1,2,-1/2) -2/3 # cf identity 07.23.03.0046.01 of Hypergeometric2F1.pdf with b=1 f <- function(h){f15.3.1(1,2,3, z=2, h=h)} # Winding number [around 1/z] matters: f(0.5) f(c(1-1i, 1+1i, -2i)) # Accuracy isn't too bad; compare numerical to analytical result : f(0.5) - (-1+1i*pi/2)
# For |z| <1 the path can be direct: f15.3.1(2,1,2,-1/2) -2/3 # cf identity 07.23.03.0046.01 of Hypergeometric2F1.pdf with b=1 f <- function(h){f15.3.1(1,2,3, z=2, h=h)} # Winding number [around 1/z] matters: f(0.5) f(c(1-1i, 1+1i, -2i)) # Accuracy isn't too bad; compare numerical to analytical result : f(0.5) - (-1+1i*pi/2)
Transformations of the hypergeometric function detailed in AMS-55, page 559-560.
f15.3.10 (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.10_a (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.10_b (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.11 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.11_bit1 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.11_bit2_a(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.11_bit2_b(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.12 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.12_bit1 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.12_bit2_a(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.12_bit2_b(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.13 (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.13_a (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.13_b (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.14_bit1_a(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14_bit1_b(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14_bit2 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.13_14 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.10_11_12 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.1.1 (A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 )
f15.3.10 (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.10_a (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.10_b (A, B, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.11 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.11_bit1 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.11_bit2_a(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.11_bit2_b(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.12 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.12_bit1 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.12_bit2_a(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.12_bit2_b(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.13 (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.13_a (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.13_b (A, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.14_bit1_a(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14_bit1_b(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 ) f15.3.14_bit2 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0 ) f15.3.13_14 (A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.3.10_11_12 (A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") f15.1.1 (A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000 )
A , B , C
|
Parameters of the hypergeometric function |
m |
Integer linking |
z |
primary complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
numerical parameters |
method |
Length 1 character vector specifying the method. See details |
Naming scheme (functions and arguments) follows AMS-55, pages 559-560.
The method
argument to (eg) f15.3.14()
specifies whether
to use psigamma()
directly (method “a
”), or the
recurrence 6.3.5 (method “b
”). Press et al recommend
method “b
”, presumably on the grounds of execution speed.
I'm not so sure (method “a
” seems to be more accurate in
the sense that it returns values closer to those of Maple).
Method “c
” means to use a totally dull, slow, direct (but
clearly correct) summation, for the purposes of debugging. This is
only used for the functions documented under wolfram.Rd
Functions f15.3.13_14()
and f15.3.10_11_12()
are
convenience wrappers. For example, function f15.3.13_14()
dispatches to either f15.3.13()
or f15.3.14()
depending on
the value of m
.
These functions are not really designed to be called by the user: use
hypergeo()
instead, or hypergeo_cover[123]()
for
specific cases.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
hypergeo
,wolfram
,hypergeo_cover1
f15.3.10_11_12(A=1.1, B=pi, m= +3, z=.1+.1i) f15.3.10_11_12(A=1.1, B=pi, m= -3, z=.1+.1i)
f15.3.10_11_12(A=1.1, B=pi, m= +3, z=.1+.1i) f15.3.10_11_12(A=1.1, B=pi, m= -3, z=.1+.1i)
Transformations of the hypergeometric function: equations 15.3.3 to 15.3.9
f15.3.3(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.4(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.5(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.6(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.7(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.8(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.9(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
f15.3.3(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.4(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.5(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.6(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.7(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.8(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) f15.3.9(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters of the hypergeometric function |
z |
Primary complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
parameters passed to |
The naming scheme follows that of Abramowitz and Stegun
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. “Handbook of mathematical functions”. New York: Dover
f15.3.4(1.1,2.2,3.4,-1+0.1i)
f15.3.4(1.1,2.2,3.4,-1+0.1i)
The hypergeometric function may be evaluated using Gauss's differential equation 15.5.1:
using a start value away from the three singular points. This page documents a suite of related functionality.
hypergeo_press(A,B,C,z, ...) f15.5.1(A, B, C, z, startz, u, udash, give=FALSE, ...) hypergeo_func(Time, State, Pars, u, udash) to_real(o) to_complex(p) complex_ode(y, times, func, parms=NA, method=NULL, u, udash, ...) semicircle(t,z0,z1,clockwise=TRUE) semidash(t,z0,z1,clockwise=TRUE) straight(t,z0,z1) straightdash(t,z0,z1)
hypergeo_press(A,B,C,z, ...) f15.5.1(A, B, C, z, startz, u, udash, give=FALSE, ...) hypergeo_func(Time, State, Pars, u, udash) to_real(o) to_complex(p) complex_ode(y, times, func, parms=NA, method=NULL, u, udash, ...) semicircle(t,z0,z1,clockwise=TRUE) semidash(t,z0,z1,clockwise=TRUE) straight(t,z0,z1) straightdash(t,z0,z1)
A , B , C , z
|
Standard parameters for the hypergeometric function |
u , udash
|
Functions to specify the path of integration, and its derivative |
give |
In function |
startz |
In function |
... |
Further arguments passed to |
o , p
|
Real and complex objects to be coerced to each other in
|
y , times , func , parms , method
|
In function |
t , z0 , z1 , clockwise
|
Arguments for the standard path functions
|
Time , State , Pars
|
arguments matchin those of standard examples
in the |
Function hypergeo_press()
is the most user-friendly of the
functions documented here. It performs integration of Gauss's ODE,
along a straight line path from the start-point to z
. It follows
Press et al's suggestion of start-point.
Function f15.5.1()
is a little more flexible in that it allows
the user to choose a start point and an integration path.
Function complex_ode()
is a complex generalization of
ode()
of package deSolve; function hypergeo_func
is an internal function, designed for use with complex_ode()
,
that specifies the Gauss ODE which is satisified by the hypergeometric
function.
Functions to_real()
and to_complex()
are internal
functions which coerce from real to complex and back; they are needed
because ode()
deals only with real values.
Functions semicircle()
and straight()
are helper
functions which specify straight or semicircular paths from z0
to z1
; note that f(0)=z0
and f(1)=z1
. Functions
semidash()
and straightdash()
provide the differential
of the path.
Accuracy is low compared with the other methods in the package.
Robin K. S. Hankin
W. H. Press et al. 1997. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Second Edition.
hypergeo_press(A=pi,B=sqrt(2),C=1.4,z=1-2i) hypergeo (A=pi,B=sqrt(2),C=1.4,z=1-2i) jj1 <- f15.5.1( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i, startz=0.5, u =function(u){semicircle(u,0.5,3+0.5i,FALSE)}, udash=function(u){semidash(u,0.5,3+0.5i,FALSE)} ) jj2 <- f15.5.1( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i, startz=0.5, u =function(u){semicircle(u,0.5,3+0.5i,TRUE)}, udash=function(u){semidash(u,0.5,3+0.5i,TRUE)} ) jj3 <- hypergeo( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i) ## First one agrees with jj3=hypergeo(...), the second one does not # Now try the Airy Ai function; satisfies f'' = zf: pars <- c(kay = 1+1i, ell = 0.1+0.2i) # not actually used airy_ai_func <- function(Time, State, Pars, u, udash) { with(as.list(c(to_complex(State), to_complex(Pars))), { z <- u(Time) dz <- udash(Time) dF <- Fdash*dz dFdash <- z*F*dz # could use kay and ell from pars here if necessary ## coerce back to real: out <- to_real(c(dF,dFdash)) names(out) <- names(State) return(list(out)) }) } complex_ode( y = c(F = 1/3^(2/3)/gamma(2/3), Fdash= -1/3^(1/3)/gamma(1/3)), times = seq(0,1,by=0.1), func = airy_ai_func, parms = pars, u = function(t){straight(t,0,1)}, udash = function(t){straightdash(t,0,1)} ) # Look at the last line for the value at 1. # compare gsl: Ai(1) = 0.1352924 ; Ai'(1) = -0.1591474 # ...although in this case there is actually a hypergeometric series # representation: f <- function(z){ return( +genhypergeo(U=NULL,L=2/3,z^3/9)/3^(2/3)/gamma(2/3) -genhypergeo(U=NULL,L=4/3,z^3/9)/3^(1/3)/gamma(1/3)*z ) } f(1)
hypergeo_press(A=pi,B=sqrt(2),C=1.4,z=1-2i) hypergeo (A=pi,B=sqrt(2),C=1.4,z=1-2i) jj1 <- f15.5.1( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i, startz=0.5, u =function(u){semicircle(u,0.5,3+0.5i,FALSE)}, udash=function(u){semidash(u,0.5,3+0.5i,FALSE)} ) jj2 <- f15.5.1( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i, startz=0.5, u =function(u){semicircle(u,0.5,3+0.5i,TRUE)}, udash=function(u){semidash(u,0.5,3+0.5i,TRUE)} ) jj3 <- hypergeo( A=1.1, B=2.2, C=3.3, z=3+0.5i) ## First one agrees with jj3=hypergeo(...), the second one does not # Now try the Airy Ai function; satisfies f'' = zf: pars <- c(kay = 1+1i, ell = 0.1+0.2i) # not actually used airy_ai_func <- function(Time, State, Pars, u, udash) { with(as.list(c(to_complex(State), to_complex(Pars))), { z <- u(Time) dz <- udash(Time) dF <- Fdash*dz dFdash <- z*F*dz # could use kay and ell from pars here if necessary ## coerce back to real: out <- to_real(c(dF,dFdash)) names(out) <- names(State) return(list(out)) }) } complex_ode( y = c(F = 1/3^(2/3)/gamma(2/3), Fdash= -1/3^(1/3)/gamma(1/3)), times = seq(0,1,by=0.1), func = airy_ai_func, parms = pars, u = function(t){straight(t,0,1)}, udash = function(t){straightdash(t,0,1)} ) # Look at the last line for the value at 1. # compare gsl: Ai(1) = 0.1352924 ; Ai'(1) = -0.1591474 # ...although in this case there is actually a hypergeometric series # representation: f <- function(z){ return( +genhypergeo(U=NULL,L=2/3,z^3/9)/3^(2/3)/gamma(2/3) -genhypergeo(U=NULL,L=4/3,z^3/9)/3^(1/3)/gamma(1/3)*z ) } f(1)
The generalized hypergeometric function, using either the series expansion or the continued fraction expansion.
genhypergeo(U, L, z, tol=0, maxiter=2000, check_mod=TRUE, polynomial=FALSE, debug=FALSE, series=TRUE) genhypergeo_series(U, L, z, tol=0, maxiter=2000, check_mod=TRUE, polynomial=FALSE, debug=FALSE) genhypergeo_contfrac(U, L, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
genhypergeo(U, L, z, tol=0, maxiter=2000, check_mod=TRUE, polynomial=FALSE, debug=FALSE, series=TRUE) genhypergeo_series(U, L, z, tol=0, maxiter=2000, check_mod=TRUE, polynomial=FALSE, debug=FALSE) genhypergeo_contfrac(U, L, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
U , L
|
Upper and lower arguments respectively (real or complex) |
z |
Primary complex argument (see notes) |
tol |
tolerance with default zero meaning to iterate until additional terms to not change the partial sum |
maxiter |
Maximum number of iterations to perform |
check_mod |
Boolean, with default |
polynomial |
Boolean, with default |
debug |
Boolean, with |
series |
In function |
Function genhypergeo()
is a wrapper for functions
genhypergeo_series()
and genhypergeo_contfrac()
.
Function genhypergeo_series()
is the workhorse for the whole
package; every call to hypergeo()
uses this function except for
the (apparently rare—but see the examples section) cases where
continued fractions are used.
The generalized hypergeometric function [here genhypergeo()
]
appears from time to time in the literature (eg Mathematica) as
where
and
are the
“upper” and “lower” vectors respectively. The
radius of convergence of this formula is 1.
For the Confluent Hypergeometric function, use genhypergeo()
with
length-1 vectors for arguments U
and V
.
For the function (ie no “upper” arguments), use
genhypergeo(NULL,L,x)
.
See documentation for genhypergeo_contfrac()
for details of
the continued fraction representation.
The radius of convergence for the series is 1 but under some
circumstances, analytic continuation defines a function over the whole
complex plane (possibly cut along ). Further
work would be required to implement this.
Function genhypergeo()
tests for its return value being either
on (or close to) the real axis, and if so, coerces its value to
numeric:
if(all(zapsmall(Im(out)) == 0)){out <- Re(out)}
Thus the code is sensitive, via zapsmall()
, to the value of
getOption("digits")
.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
genhypergeo(U=c(1.1,0.2,0.3), L=c(10.1,pi*4), check_mod=FALSE, z=1.12+0.2i) genhypergeo(U=c(1.1,0.2,0.3), L=c(10.1,pi*4),z=4.12+0.2i,series=FALSE)
genhypergeo(U=c(1.1,0.2,0.3), L=c(10.1,pi*4), check_mod=FALSE, z=1.12+0.2i) genhypergeo(U=c(1.1,0.2,0.3), L=c(10.1,pi*4),z=4.12+0.2i,series=FALSE)
Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using Gosper's method
hypergeo_gosper(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
hypergeo_gosper(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters (real or complex) |
z |
Complex argument |
tol |
tolerance (passed to |
maxiter |
maximum number of iterations |
Gosper provides a three-term recurrence which converges when is
close to a critical point.
Bill Gosper asserts that the recursion holds for values of which
are inside the cardioid
(sqrt(8)*cos(t)-2*cos(2t),
sqrt(8)*sin(t)-2*sin(2t))
(see examples section).
It is suggested that the recursion should only be used when the
auxiliary parameters A, B,C are all in absolute
value.
R code by Robin K. S. Hankin, transcribed from maxima code posted by Richard Fateman, who credited Bill Gosper
Original email was archived at
https://www.ma.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/000126.html
but
does not appear there now; and the wayback machine doesn't find it
either.
hypergeo_gosper(1.1,5.1,3.1,crit()) # Compare MMA: -0.192225 + 0.692328 I t <- seq(from=0,to=2i*pi,len=100) plot(exp(t)*(sqrt(8)-exp(t)),asp=1,type='l') points(crit())
hypergeo_gosper(1.1,5.1,3.1,crit()) # Compare MMA: -0.192225 + 0.692328 I t <- seq(from=0,to=2i*pi,len=100) plot(exp(t)*(sqrt(8)-exp(t)),asp=1,type='l') points(crit())
The Hypergeometric and generalized hypergeometric functions as defined
by Abramowitz and Stegun. Function hypergeo()
is the user
interface to the majority of the package functionality; it dispatches to
one of a number of subsidiary functions.
hypergeo(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter=2000)
hypergeo(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter=2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters for |
z |
Primary argument, complex |
tol |
absolute tolerance; default value of zero means to continue iterating until the result does not change to machine precision; strictly positive values give less accuracy but faster evaluation |
maxiter |
Integer specifying maximum number of iterations |
The hypergeometric function as defined by Abramowitz and Stegun, equation 15.1.1, page 556 is
where
is the Pochammer symbol (6.1.22, page 256).
Function hypergeo()
is the front-end for a rather unwieldy set
of back-end functions which are called when the parameters A
,
B
, C
take certain values.
The general case (that is, when the parameters do not fall into a
“special” category), is handled by hypergeo_general()
.
This applies whichever of the transformations given on page 559 gives
the smallest modulus for the argument z
.
Sometimes hypergeo_general()
and all the transformations on
page 559 fail to converge, in which case hypergeo()
uses the
continued fraction expansion hypergeo_contfrac()
.
If this fails, the function uses integration via f15.3.1()
.
Abramowitz and Stegun state:
“The radius of convergence of the Gauss hypergeometric series
is
” (AMS-55, section
15.1, page 556).
This reference book gives the correct radius of convergence; use the
ratio test to verify it. Thus if , the hypergeometric series
will diverge and function
genhypergeo()
will fail to converge.
However, the hypergeometric function is defined over the whole of the
complex plane, so analytic continuation may be used if appropriate cut
lines are used. A cut line must join to (complex) infinity;
it is conventional for it to follow the real axis in a positive
direction from
but other choices are possible.
Note that in using the package one sometimes draws a
“full precision not achieved” warning from gamma()
; and
complex arguments are not allowed. I would suggest either ignoring the
warning (the error of gamma()
is unlikely to be large) or to use
one of the bespoke functions such as f15.3.4()
and tolerate the
slower convergence, although this is not always possible.
Robin K. S. Hankin
Abramowitz and Stegun 1955. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables (AMS-55). National Bureau of Standards
hypergeo_powerseries
,
hypergeo_contfrac
, genhypergeo
# equation 15.1.3, page 556: f1 <- function(x){-log(1-x)/x} f2 <- function(x){hypergeo(1,1,2,x)} f3 <- function(x){hypergeo(1,1,2,x,tol=1e-10)} x <- seq(from = -0.6,to=0.6,len=14) f1(x)-f2(x) f1(x)-f3(x) # Note tighter tolerance # equation 15.1.7, p556: g1 <- function(x){log(x + sqrt(1+x^2))/x} g2 <- function(x){hypergeo(1/2,1/2,3/2,-x^2)} g1(x)-g2(x) # should be small abs(g1(x+0.1i) - g2(x+0.1i)) # should have small modulus. # Just a random call, verified by Maple [ Hypergeom([],[1.22],0.9087) ]: genhypergeo(NULL,1.22,0.9087) # Little test of vectorization (warning: inefficient): hypergeo(A=1.2+matrix(1:10,2,5)/10, B=1.4, C=1.665, z=1+2i) # following calls test for former bugs: hypergeo(1,2.1,4.1,1+0.1i) hypergeo(1.1,5,2.1,1+0.1i) hypergeo(1.9, 2.9, 1.9+2.9+4,1+0.99i) # c=a+b+4; hypergeo_cover1()
# equation 15.1.3, page 556: f1 <- function(x){-log(1-x)/x} f2 <- function(x){hypergeo(1,1,2,x)} f3 <- function(x){hypergeo(1,1,2,x,tol=1e-10)} x <- seq(from = -0.6,to=0.6,len=14) f1(x)-f2(x) f1(x)-f3(x) # Note tighter tolerance # equation 15.1.7, p556: g1 <- function(x){log(x + sqrt(1+x^2))/x} g2 <- function(x){hypergeo(1/2,1/2,3/2,-x^2)} g1(x)-g2(x) # should be small abs(g1(x+0.1i) - g2(x+0.1i)) # should have small modulus. # Just a random call, verified by Maple [ Hypergeom([],[1.22],0.9087) ]: genhypergeo(NULL,1.22,0.9087) # Little test of vectorization (warning: inefficient): hypergeo(A=1.2+matrix(1:10,2,5)/10, B=1.4, C=1.665, z=1+2i) # following calls test for former bugs: hypergeo(1,2.1,4.1,1+0.1i) hypergeo(1.1,5,2.1,1+0.1i) hypergeo(1.9, 2.9, 1.9+2.9+4,1+0.99i) # c=a+b+4; hypergeo_cover1()
Hypergeometric functions for A and/or B being nonpositive integers
hypergeo_A_nonpos_int(A, B, C, z, tol = 0) hypergeo_AorB_nonpos_int(A, B, C, z, tol = 0)
hypergeo_A_nonpos_int(A, B, C, z, tol = 0) hypergeo_AorB_nonpos_int(A, B, C, z, tol = 0)
A , B , C
|
Parameters for the hypergeometric function |
z |
Primary complex argument |
tol |
tolerance |
The “point” of these functions is that if A and C (or B and C) are identical nonpositive integers, a warning needs to be given because the function is defined as the appropriate limit and one needs to be sure that both A and C approach that limit at the same speed.
Function hypergeo_AorB_nonpos_int()
is a convenience wrapper
for hypergeo_A_nonpos_int()
.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
jjR1 <- hypergeo(-4, pi, 2.2 , 1+6i) jjR2 <- hypergeo(pi, -4, 2.2 , 1+6i) # former bug jjM <- 3464.1890402837334002-353.94143580568566281i # value given by Mathematica
jjR1 <- hypergeo(-4, pi, 2.2 , 1+6i) jjR2 <- hypergeo(pi, -4, 2.2 , 1+6i) # former bug jjM <- 3464.1890402837334002-353.94143580568566281i # value given by Mathematica
Continued fraction expansion of the hypergeometric and generalized hypergeometric functions using continued fraction expansion.
hypergeo_contfrac(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) genhypergeo_contfrac_single(U, L, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
hypergeo_contfrac(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) genhypergeo_contfrac_single(U, L, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters (real or complex) |
U , L
|
In function |
z |
Complex argument |
tol |
tolerance (passed to |
maxiter |
maximum number of iterations |
These functions are included in the package in the interests of completeness, but it is not clear when it is advantageous to use continued fraction form rather than the series form.
The continued fraction expression is the RHS identity 07.23.10.0001.01 of
Hypergeometric2F1.pdf
.
The function sometimes fails to converge to the correct value but no warning is given.
Function genhypergeo_contfrac()
is documented under
genhypergeo.Rd
.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
hypergeo_contfrac(0.3 , 0.6 , 3.3 , 0.1+0.3i) # Compare Maple: 1.0042808294775511972+0.17044041575976110947e-1i genhypergeo_contfrac_single(U=0.2 , L=c(9.9,2.7,8.7) , z=1+10i) # (powerseries does not converge) # Compare Maple: 1.0007289707983569879 + 0.86250714217251837317e-2i
hypergeo_contfrac(0.3 , 0.6 , 3.3 , 0.1+0.3i) # Compare Maple: 1.0042808294775511972+0.17044041575976110947e-1i genhypergeo_contfrac_single(U=0.2 , L=c(9.9,2.7,8.7) , z=1+10i) # (powerseries does not converge) # Compare Maple: 1.0007289707983569879 + 0.86250714217251837317e-2i
Hypergeometric functions for special values of the parameters
hypergeo_cover1(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE) hypergeo_cover2(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE) hypergeo_cover3(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE)
hypergeo_cover1(A, B, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE) hypergeo_cover2(A, C, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE) hypergeo_cover3(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a", give = FALSE)
A , B , C
|
parameters for the hypergeometric function |
m , n
|
Integers (positive or negative) |
z |
Primary complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
Numerical arguments passed to |
method |
Method, passed to |
give |
Boolean with |
These functions deal with the exceptional cases listed on page 559-560.
Function hypergeo_cover1()
deals with the case
Function hypergeo_cover2()
deals with the case
Function hypergeo_cover3()
deals with the case
[elementary] and
[not covered by AMS-55]
Function hypergeo_cover3()
is required because the
“limiting process” mentioned on p560, just after 15.3.14, is
not explicit. Which is why it dispatches to
w07.23.06.0026.01()
and w07.23.06.0031.01()
,
documented at wolfram
.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
# Test hypergeo_cover1(): jjR <- hypergeo(pi,pi/2,3*pi/2-4, z=0.1+0.2i) jjM <- 0.53745229690249593045 + 1.8917456473240515664i # Test hypergeo_cover2(): jjM <- -0.15888831928748121465e-5 + 0.40339599711492215912e-4i jjR <- hypergeo(pi,pi+2, 1.1 , 1+10i) # This is 15.3.13 stopifnot(Mod(jjR-jjM)<1e-10) # Test hypergeo_cover3() jjM <- -0.24397135980533720308e-1 + 0.28819643319432922231i jjR <- hypergeo(pi, 1.4, pi+4, 1+6i) stopifnot(Mod(jjR-jjM)<1e-10)
# Test hypergeo_cover1(): jjR <- hypergeo(pi,pi/2,3*pi/2-4, z=0.1+0.2i) jjM <- 0.53745229690249593045 + 1.8917456473240515664i # Test hypergeo_cover2(): jjM <- -0.15888831928748121465e-5 + 0.40339599711492215912e-4i jjR <- hypergeo(pi,pi+2, 1.1 , 1+10i) # This is 15.3.13 stopifnot(Mod(jjR-jjM)<1e-10) # Test hypergeo_cover3() jjM <- -0.24397135980533720308e-1 + 0.28819643319432922231i jjR <- hypergeo(pi, 1.4, pi+4, 1+6i) stopifnot(Mod(jjR-jjM)<1e-10)
The hypergeometric function as determined by infinite
(hypergeo_powerseries()
) or finite (hypergeo_taylor()
)
power series
hypergeo_powerseries(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
hypergeo_powerseries(A, B, C, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters of the hypergeometric function |
z |
Primary complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
Numerical arguments |
Function hypergeo_powerseries()
is the primary decision-making
function of the package. It is this function that detects degenerate
cases of the three parameters and dispatches accordingly.
Non-degenerate cases are sent to function hypergeo_general()
.
Function hypergeo_taylor()
deals with cases where the
hypergeometric function is a polynomial.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
jjR <- hypergeo(pi,-4,2.2,1+5i) jjM <- 1670.8287595795885335 - 204.81995157365381258i
jjR <- hypergeo(pi,-4,2.2,1+5i) jjM <- 1670.8287595795885335 - 204.81995157365381258i
Helper functions for equations 15.3.6-15.3.9
i15.3.6(A, B, C) i15.3.7(A, B, C) i15.3.8(A, B, C) i15.3.9(A, B, C) j15.3.6(A, B, C) j15.3.7(A, B, C) j15.3.8(A, B, C) j15.3.9(A, B, C)
i15.3.6(A, B, C) i15.3.7(A, B, C) i15.3.8(A, B, C) i15.3.9(A, B, C) j15.3.6(A, B, C) j15.3.7(A, B, C) j15.3.8(A, B, C) j15.3.9(A, B, C)
A , B , C
|
Parameters of the hypergeometric function |
These functions are named for their equation numbers in Abramowitz and Stegun.
Functions i15.3.?()
return the factors at the beginning of
equations 15.3.6-9. These functions return zero if the denominator is
infinite (because it includes a gamma function of a nonpositive
integer).
Functions j15.3.?()
check for the appropriate
arguments of the gamma function being nonpositive integers.
Robin K. S. Hankin
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun 1965. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover
i15.3.6(1.1, 3.2, pi)
i15.3.6(1.1, 3.2, pi)
Various utilities needing nonce functions
is.near_integer(i, tol=getOption("tolerance")) is.nonpos(i) is.zero(i) isgood(x, tol) thingfun(z, complex=FALSE) crit(...) lpham(x,n)
is.near_integer(i, tol=getOption("tolerance")) is.nonpos(i) is.zero(i) isgood(x, tol) thingfun(z, complex=FALSE) crit(...) lpham(x,n)
i |
Numerical vector of suspected integers |
tol |
Tolerance |
x |
Argument to |
z |
Complex vector |
complex |
In function |
n |
second argument to |
... |
Ignored |
Function is.near_integer(i)
returns TRUE
if
i
is “near” [that is, within tol
] an integer;
if the option is unset then 1e-11
is used.
Function is.nonpos()
returns TRUE
if i
is
near a nonpositive integer
Function is.zero()
returns TRUE
if i
is,
er, near zero
Function isgood()
checks for all elements of x
having absolute values less than tol
Function thingfun()
transforms input vector z
by
each of the six members of the anharmonic group, viewed as a
subgroup of the Mobius group of functions. It returns a real
six-column matrix with columns being the modulus of
. These six columns
correspond to the primary argument in equations 15.3.3 to 15.3.9,
p551 of AMS-55
Function crit()
returns the two critical points,
. These
points have unit modulus as do their six transforms by
thingfun()
Function lpham()
returns the log of the Pochhammer
function
Function isgood()
uses zero as the default tolerance (argument
tol
passed in from hypergeo()
);
compare the different meaning of tol
used in
is.near_integer()
.
Here, “integer” means one of the sequence [ie not the Gaussian integers].
Robin K. S. Hankin
is.near_integer(-3) is.zero(4)
is.near_integer(-3) is.zero(4)
Expansion of the hypergeometric function
using the residue theorem; useful for when the primary argument is close
to the critical points
hypergeo_residue_general(A, B, C, z, r, O=z, tol=0, maxiter=2000) hypergeo_residue_close_to_crit_single(A, B, C, z, strategy='A', tol=0, maxiter=2000) hypergeo_residue_close_to_crit_multiple(A, B, C, z, strategy='A', tol=0, maxiter=2000)
hypergeo_residue_general(A, B, C, z, r, O=z, tol=0, maxiter=2000) hypergeo_residue_close_to_crit_single(A, B, C, z, strategy='A', tol=0, maxiter=2000) hypergeo_residue_close_to_crit_multiple(A, B, C, z, strategy='A', tol=0, maxiter=2000)
A , B , C
|
Parameters (real or complex) |
z |
Complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
tolerance and maximum number of iterations (passed to |
r , O
|
Radius and center of circle to integrate over |
strategy |
Indicates which strategy to use. Strategy ‘A’
means to use the critical point as the centre of the circle and
strategy ‘B’ means to use |
These functions are not really intended for the user; hypergeo()
uses hypergeo_residue_close_to_crit_multiple()
when
is less than
(hardwired) for
being either of the two critical points. Infinite regress is
avoided because the contour is always more than this distance from the
critical points.
These functions use the residue theorem
to evaluate the hypergeometric function near the two
critical points
. These
points are problematic because all of the transformations listed under
thingfun()
take the points either to themselves or each other.
At these points the ratio of successive terms in the hypergeometric series tends to one and thus numerical summation is difficult.
The hypergeometric function, however, is not at all badly behaved near these critical points (see examples); but OTOH there do not seem to be any identities for the hypergeometric function at these points.
I have not investigated in detail whether strategy ‘A’ or
‘B’ is better. I would expect that ‘A’ is faster but
‘B’ more accurate, on the grounds that ‘A’ uses a contour
whose closest approach to the critical point is further than that of
‘B’; but ‘B’ uses a contour which does not vary in
distance from .
But both seem to be fairly accurate and fairly fast, and I have not systematically investigated the pros and cons.
The residue theorem appears to be absurdly accurate for numerical evaluation
Robin K. S. Hankin
W. Buhring 1987. “An analytic continuation of the hypergeometric series”, Siam J. Math. Anal. 18(3)
c1 <- 1/2-sqrt(3)/2i c2 <- 1/2+sqrt(3)/2i a1_R <- hypergeo(1/2,1/3,pi,c1) a1_M <- 1.0154051314906669 + 0.0544835896509068i x <- y <- seq(from=-0.1,to=0.1,len=100) elliptic::view(x,y,hypergeo(1/2,1,1/3,outer(x,1i*y,"+")))
c1 <- 1/2-sqrt(3)/2i c2 <- 1/2+sqrt(3)/2i a1_R <- hypergeo(1/2,1/3,pi,c1) a1_M <- 1.0154051314906669 + 0.0544835896509068i x <- y <- seq(from=-0.1,to=0.1,len=100) elliptic::view(x,y,hypergeo(1/2,1,1/3,outer(x,1i*y,"+")))
Evaluation of the hypergeometric function using Shanks transformation of successive sums
hypergeo_shanks(A,B,C,z,maxiter=20) genhypergeo_shanks(U,L,z,maxiter=20) shanks(Last,This,Next)
hypergeo_shanks(A,B,C,z,maxiter=20) genhypergeo_shanks(U,L,z,maxiter=20) shanks(Last,This,Next)
A , B , C
|
Parameters (real or complex) |
U , L
|
Upper and lower vectors |
z |
Primary complex argument |
maxiter |
Maximum number of iterations |
Last , This , Next
|
Three successive convergents |
The Shanks transformation of successive partial sums is
and if the tend to a limit then the sequence
often converges more rapidly than
. However, the denominator
is susceptible to catastrophic rounding under fixed-precision
arithmetic and it is difficult to know when to stop iterating.
The
Robin K. S. Hankin
Shanks, D. (1955). “Non-linear transformation of divergent and slowly convergent sequences”, Journal of Mathematics and Physics 34:1-42
hypergeo_shanks(1/2,1/3,pi,z= 0.1+0.2i)
hypergeo_shanks(1/2,1/3,pi,z= 0.1+0.2i)
Various functions taken from the Wolfram Functions Site
w07.23.06.0026.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") w07.23.06.0026.01_bit1(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit2(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_a(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_b(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_c(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0029.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01_bit1(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01_bit2(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
w07.23.06.0026.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000, method = "a") w07.23.06.0026.01_bit1(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit2(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_a(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_b(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0026.01_bit3_c(A, n, m, z, tol = 0) w07.23.06.0029.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01_bit1(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000) w07.23.06.0031.01_bit2(A, n, m, z, tol = 0, maxiter = 2000)
A |
Parameter of hypergeometric function |
m , n
|
Integers |
z |
Primary complex argument |
tol , maxiter
|
Numerical arguments as per |
method |
Character, specifying method to be used |
The method
argument is described at f15.3.10
. All
functions' names follow the conventions in
Hypergeometric2F1.pdf
.
Function w07.23.06.0026.01(A, n, m, z)
returns
where
and
are nonnegative integers with
.
Function w07.23.06.0029.01(A, n, m, z)
returns
.
Function w07.23.06.0031.01(A, n, m, z)
returns
with
.
These functions use the psigamma()
function which does not yet
take complex arguments; this means that complex values for A
are not supported. I'm working on it.
Robin K. S. Hankin
http://functions.wolfram.com/PDF/Hypergeometric2F1.pdf
# Here we catch some answers from Maple (jjM) and compare it with R's: jjM <- 0.95437201847068289095 + 0.80868687461954479439i # Maple's answer jjR <- w07.23.06.0026.01(A=1.1 , n=1 , m=4 , z=1+1i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(1.1, 2.1, 5.1, 1+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-10) jjM <- -0.25955090546083991160e-3 - 0.59642767921444716242e-3i jjR <- w07.23.06.0029.01(A=4.1 , n=1 , m=1 , z=1+4i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(4.1, 3.1, 5.1, 1+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-15) jjM <- 0.33186808222278923715e-1 - 0.40188208572232037363e-1i jjR <- w07.23.06.0031.01(6.7,2,1,2+1i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(6.7, 8.7, 7.7, 2+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-10)
# Here we catch some answers from Maple (jjM) and compare it with R's: jjM <- 0.95437201847068289095 + 0.80868687461954479439i # Maple's answer jjR <- w07.23.06.0026.01(A=1.1 , n=1 , m=4 , z=1+1i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(1.1, 2.1, 5.1, 1+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-10) jjM <- -0.25955090546083991160e-3 - 0.59642767921444716242e-3i jjR <- w07.23.06.0029.01(A=4.1 , n=1 , m=1 , z=1+4i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(4.1, 3.1, 5.1, 1+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-15) jjM <- 0.33186808222278923715e-1 - 0.40188208572232037363e-1i jjR <- w07.23.06.0031.01(6.7,2,1,2+1i) # [In practice, one would type 'hypergeo(6.7, 8.7, 7.7, 2+1i)'] stopifnot(Mod(jjM - jjR) < 1e-10)